UAV SILM
A fixed-wing, pusher-type reconnaissance aircraft concept built around a low cost and a minimal field footprint. It's light enough to hand-launch, lands on its belly, and needs no runway or launch equipment.
A cheap, repeatable ISR concept for small states
UAV SILM is a self-built fixed-wing reconnaissance UAV concept: a 1.4 m wingspan, roughly 1.6 kg pusher-type aircraft designed for ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance) use, built for long-endurance observation on a low budget and a minimal logistics footprint. It's light enough to hand-launch and lands on its belly, with no runway or launch equipment needed.
Current professional reconnaissance UAV platforms are expensive, often subject to export or trade restrictions, and hard to produce or adapt quickly in the field. Small states and civil-defence organisations lack affordable, quickly-built, easily-maintained reconnaissance platforms that can be built and repeated locally.
The target group is Estonia's defence and security sector: the Defence Forces, Kaitseliit, and the Police and Border Guard Board, plus more broadly European defence development programmes. No engagement with these organisations has taken place yet; this is the intended long-term audience for the concept. It matters because:
- a low-cost, domestically-built airframe (target unit cost under $500) could put the platform within reach of organisations without a professional-system budget;
- long calculated endurance (~100 min target flight time) would enable genuine observation and reconnaissance work;
- a secure link concept (4G LTE / WireGuard MAVLink failsafe) is designed to keep data protected and the link operational even under GPS interference.
- Most hobby-grade fixed-wing UAVs aren't optimised for ISR use. SILM's endurance target, airfoil selection and airframe design come from CFD analysis aimed specifically at that purpose.
- It's designed to pair open-source flight control (ArduPilot-compatible) with an encrypted 4G/WireGuard backup link, an unusual combination for a student-scale build.
- The whole design process (XFLR5 CFD analysis, centre-of-gravity calculations, materials selection) is documented and repeatable, which is the point: a base that can be extended, corrected, or used for training.
Swap the parts, not the airframe
The airframe is designed around modular components rather than a single fixed configuration, so the same base platform could be reconfigured for different missions.
Modular design
- Can swap for cheaper, higher aspect-ratio wings to complete lower-paced missions or deliver explosive payloads
- Modular screw-on nose cone can carry either an explosive or an ISR payload
- Centre of gravity can be adjusted easily by changing which modules are fitted
Versatile
- 3D-printable airframe
- Affordable — target unit cost under $500
- Suited to military use, but equally to agricultural, urban, or forestry-related topographic survey work
- Lightweight and launchable by hand
What the design is calculated to do
Every number below comes from XFLR5 vortex-lattice analysis (VLM1/VLM2) and hand calculation over the current geometry, not from a flight test. Treat it as a design target, not a spec sheet.
Performance
- Endurance target: ~100 min
- Cruise L/D: low-to-mid 20s
- Stall speed: ~9–10 m/s (calc.)
Stability
- Static margin: ~18.5% MAC
- Positive Cm slope (stable)
- V-tail lever arm: ~0.41 m
Autonomy & link
- ArduPilot-compatible autopilot
- Mission trajectory planned on a map, flown as GPS waypoints
- 4G LTE / WireGuard failsafe concept
Long-shaft fixed-wing pusher motor on a 4S LiPo pack, sized against the 1.6 kg all-up mass with margin for material or battery changes. Full component models are listed under Tools & materials below.
ArduPilot-compatible autopilot with GPS and digital airspeed sensing, capable of autonomous waypoint flight. Mission routes are planned on a map in ground-control software (e.g. Mission Planner or QGroundControl) and uploaded to the autopilot before launch, so the aircraft can fly a pre-set trajectory without continuous manual control. A 4G LTE module paired with an encrypted WireGuard link is planned as a MAVLink failsafe channel, intended to keep telemetry and control available under GPS interference or beyond normal radio-link range. The concept is borrowed from professional encrypted-link systems, adapted here to commodity hardware.
The nose cone is designed to screw on and off, so the same airframe can carry an ISR sensor payload or be reconfigured, without redesigning the fuselage. Swapping the wing set for a cheaper, higher-aspect-ratio pair is intended to trade cruise performance for lower-cost, lower-tempo missions. Because the modules attach at fixed stations, moving the centre of gravity is mostly a matter of choosing which modules are fitted.
Engineering-led, supported by five other fields
Engineering (aeronautical / aerodynamics) and technology (electronics, software).
Physics
Aerodynamics: lift and drag calculations in XFLR5, centre-of-gravity and balance, flight dynamics.
Mathematics
CG location calculations, wing and tail surface dimensions, static margin and load-factor calculations.
Materials science
LW-PLA for 3D-printed parts, epoxy resin for sealing, carbon-fibre spar.
IT
Flight control software (ArduPilot), encrypted link (WireGuard on a companion computer), GPS/telemetry.
Civics / defence
Application context: Estonian and European defence capability, dual-use technology ethics and regulation.
Project management
Task tracking, budgeting, procurement, and coordinating three people's work across a shared design.
Team and responsibilities
Hover or tap a card for what each person is actually working on.
- Full-aircraft XFLR5 CFD (wing, fuselage, complete model)
- V-tail dimensioning and incidence/twist study
- Wing structural analysis & rib design
- Nose cone camera compartment & mounting thread
- Propeller research (10" diameter confirmed)
- Ruddervator modelling & sectioning
- Flight-controller programming research
- Datalink research
- Component confirmation & internal layout
"Fixed-Wing UAV Design: A Systems Engineering Approach" (ResearchGate)
ScienceDirect article on fixed-wing UAVs
"Development of a Hand-Launched Small UAV for Ground Reconnaissance" (ResearchGate)
UAS Components (uascomponents.com)
IRE Journal (irejournals.com)
Professional encrypted flight-controller literature (AES-256 link systems)
GitHub project "Drone-Based Reconnaissance of Military Assets"
Claude (Anthropic)
Construction and electronics
Construction
| Material | Use |
|---|---|
| LW-PLA (lightweight PLA) | 3D-printed airframe and structure |
| Carbon-fibre tube (spar) | Wing load-bearing structure |
| Epoxy resin | Sealing |
Electronics — from the team's shopping list
| Component | Model |
|---|---|
| Flight controller | Matek H743-WING V3 |
| ESC | Hobbywing Skywalker 60A V2 |
| GPS / compass | Matek M10Q-5883 |
| Airspeed sensor | Matek ASPD-4525 + pitot tube |
| 4G link module | Waveshare SIM7600E-H HAT |
| Camera | Siyi A2 Mini (160° FPV gimbal, 1080p) |
| Battery | Gens Ace G-Tech 7000mAh 4S 60C, XT90 |
| Motor | T-Motor AT2321 (1250KV, long shaft) |
This table lists only components confirmed in the team's shopping-links document; servos, radio link, and companion-computer hardware are still being finalised.
Flight log
Ground and flight testing haven't started yet — this table fills in as tests happen.
| Flight # | Date | Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Pending | — | Ground systems check |
| 02 | Pending | — | First hand-launch, straight flight |
| 03 | Pending | — | Endurance & range validation |
Five stages, design to presentation
Target dates below, working back from the presentation on 8 December 2026.
Design & analysis
- Airfoil selection and CFD analysis in XFLR5
- Full-aircraft geometry, mass and CG modelling
- Control-surface (aileron, ruddervator) evaluation
Procurement & components
- Ordering electronics components
- Sourcing structural materials
Build
- 3D printing the airframe and wing
- Electronics installation and wiring
- Setting up the link / failsafe concept (4G/WireGuard)
Testing
- Ground tests (electronics, link)
- First flight tests (hand-launch, belly landing)
- Endurance and range validation
Presentation & documentation
- Results summary
- Finalising the project page and presentation
- Presentation day: 8 December 2026
What's done, what's next
- CFD analysis completed in XFLR5 (VLM1/VLM2); MH32 airfoil selected over RG15 and SD7037
- Full-aircraft geometry finalised: 1.40 m span, 0.263 m² area, AR 7.46, high-wing / V-tail layout
- Mass and CG modelling complete — X_CG 0.335 m, static margin 18.5% at ≈1.58–1.60 kg
- Aileron and ruddervator control-surface response evaluated at multiple deflections
- Electronics components selected and sourcing links collected
- Cost target set — under $500 per unit
- Finalising V-tail geometry and construction details
- Ordering and receiving components
- 3D printing the airframe and wing
- Assembling electronics and testing the link / failsafe concept
- Running the first ground and flight tests
This is an ongoing student STEAM project, not a finished aircraft. Every figure on this page (mass, endurance, cost, control response) is a theoretical estimate derived from CFD analysis and hand calculation, not from flight test data. No formal discussions have been held with Kaitseliit or the Estonian Defence Forces; the platform is presented here as a design study and a longer-term aspiration toward a working, versatile aircraft.